When To Bet Each Way?

Each way – bet type that polarises opinion in the horse racing world. Some see it as the comfort blanket, the bank preserver. Others are not quite so positive; the bet of fools, stifling bank growth, they claim. So, just which camp is right? Is there a definitive answer as to if you should bet each way? And if so, when?

What Is Each Way Betting?

An each way bet is essentially two equal bets placed on one selection – one part placed on a horse to win and the other on the horse to place. A £10 each way bet would total £20, with £10 on the win and £10 on the place. If the horse is victorious, both parts of the bet are paid out, but if the horse finishes placed, but doesn’t win, only the place part is paid out.

Each Way Terms

The each way terms differ depending on the race type and the size of the field:

Non-Handicap Races

2 – 4 Runners: Win Only (1st place only)
5 – 7 Runners: A 1/4 the odds over 2 places (1st and 2nd place)
8 or more Runners: A 1/5th the odds over 3 places (1st, 2nd and 3rd place)

Handicap Races

2 – 4 Runners: Win Only (1st place only)
5 – 7 Runners: A 1/4 the odds over 2 places (1st and 2nd place)
8 – 11 Runners: A 1/5th the odds over 3 places (1st, 2nd and 3rd place)
12 – 15 Runners: A 1/4 the odds over 3 places (1st, 2nd and 3rd place)
16 or more Runners: A 1/4 the odds over 4 places (1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th place)

For instance if we backed a horse each way at +1000 in a 10 runner handicap, and it finished second, the returns would be:

Place part would be paid at 5th the odds of +1000 .
10/5 = 2/1 x £10 = Return of £30

Easy? Then try out an each way bet at one of our recommended betting sites.

Top Bookies for Each Way Horse Racing Bets

1
Bovada
50% Up to $250
2
BetOnline
50% Up to $1000
3
Bookmaker
15% Up to $2500
4
MyBookie
50% up to $3000
5
JustBet
50% Up to $2500

Principles Behind Each Way Betting

The each way terms are actually very important to determining whether an each way bet is a shrewd move. The number of runners plays a significant part in determining whether betting each way is the value option.

Take for instance a 16 runner handicap, a race which pays 1/4th the odds each way for the first 4 places. These are races which favour the punter and fields that the bookmakers disdain. Punters will often scream foul play when a 16 runner handicap mysteriously has a late withdrawal to reduce the terms from each way paying 4 places, to 3. Why is this important to the value aspect? In a 16 runner race, all things being equal, the chance of any runner being successful is +1500 . Again, all runners have an equal chance of finishing in any position, so the chance of finishing 1st-4th is +300 (25%), 5-8th is +300 (25%) and so on. However, due to the race terms, punters are getting odds of +375 about what is in reality a +300 chance.

If we break this down to percentage chances of success:

3/1 = 25%
15/4 = 21%

The value edge for an each way bet in a 16 runner handicap, where there are 4 places paid and all runners have the same chance, is 4%. To emphasise the importance of the number of runners and terms further, let’s assume there are 15 runners and the place terms are now ¼ odds first 3 home. The odds of each horse winning the race are now 14/1 per runner, and the chance of a horse finishing in the top 3 is now 4/1 (as the horse has an equal chance of finishing 1-3rd, 4-6th, 7-9th, 10-12th, 13-15th). With each runner now having a 14/4 chance of placing, the percentages now look like this:

+400 = 20%
+350 = 22.2%

Where there was a value edge of 4% in the 16 runner field, (we were getting paid out at the odds which suggested the chance of placing was +375 – 21%, when in fact they were +300 – 25%), in the 15 runner field we are giving up 2.2% in value, getting paid out at +350 for a bet that realistically has only a 20% chance of success.

It is crucial to take into account the number of places that are paid out and the number of runners in the field when deciding if an each way bet offers value. Obviously getting 1/5th odds for the first 3 in an 8 runner field is better than getting those same terms when there are 11 runners, as there is more competition for the places. The rule is the lowest number of runners in each bracket of each way terms, the better the value. These bets can be profitable and shrewd given the right race conditions.

The Each Way Bets Bookmakers Don’t Like

Bookmakers like things to be on their own terms. They like to have the odds in their favour and the vast majority of the time, they get their own way. However, there are a few circumstances in which punters have an advantage over their adversaries, and each way betting can provide that rare opportunity.

Dirty/snide/thieving each way bets can be found in races were there is generally a strong favourite (usually odds on), and a second and maybe third favourite with only small chance of upsetting the market leaders but a very good chance of filling the places. The rest of the field are usually big prices i.e. +1400 bar.

Bookies hate these races. Why? Because they cannot set different odds for the win terms and the place terms. They have to set one price and then the place odds are determined by the each way terms for that race. This can create some excellent value in the place market.

Let’s take for example a 9 runner race, which looks like this:

Horse A -150
Horse B +400
Horse C +900

+2500 Bar

Horse A is clearly a strong favourite, but it is Horse B we are interested in. This runner offers plenty of value on the place side of things. But why?

Well in a 9 runner field, where the odds are 1/5th first 3, we would receive -125 for the place.

However, when looking on a betting exchange where those offering odds ARE able to provide separate prices for the win and place parts of the bet, Horse B would typically be available in the place market at around -222 and in the win market at around +500 +550 . The difference in the win part of the bet is almost immaterial as there is such HUGE value on the place part of the bet:

Odds on offer = -125 (55.6%)

Actual odds = -222 (69.0%)

The place part of the bet has a 69% chance of success, but is being paid out as if it only had a 55.6% of winning. But why is this so? Because of the uncompetitive nature of the race. If the favourite were not running, Horse B would be around an +138 shot (42.1%) to win. Therefore by adding up the chance of upsetting the favourite, coming second and finishing 3rd, the chance of finishing in the top 3 for each way purposes, is much greater than the -125 odds we are getting.

Compounding the Value

Multiples are generally a bet type to stick well clear of, as the bookmakers make big profits as soon as one selection fails to win. The Lucky 15 is an exception to that rule, especially when there are some dirty each way bets in the mix. Lucky 15’s consist of 4 selections, with singles, doubles trebles and a fourfold totalling 15 bets, and when they are placed each way, this is doubled to a total of 30. A £1 each way Lucky 15 will cost a punter £30 to place. One of the benefits of this bet is that most bookmakers will offer concessions such as treble the odds for one winner.

The value from snide each way bets can be compounded into the Lucky 15 to bring regular profits. Without delving into the mechanics too much, take for instance the fourfold part of the bet where we have four horses that offer the same value as Horse B in the previous example – all available at +400 and -125 the place, but with the true odds on the place side of the bet being far more lucrative.

Place odds on each runner:  -125

Odds received:

1.8 x 1.8 x 1.8 x 1.8 = 10.5 =
9.5% chance

True odds:

1.45 x 1.45 x 1.45 x 1.45 = 4.42 =
22.6% chance

The fourfold part of the bet is paid out at odds of , when in fact the true odds of it being successful are . In this bet, there is 13.1% (22.6-9.5) value, which is massive. Factor in that there is a chance one of the selections may win (if not more) and that runner will be paid out at treble the odds, and the bet suddenly looks even more appealing.

Final Thoughts

Those that smugly state as if it were a fact that each way betting is for mugs, clearly have a lot to learn themselves. Granted, there are certain conditions and scenarios where it is foolish to strike an each way bet (7 runner field, two places paid etc.), but there are regularly scenarios where as a punter, the odds are in your favour. Every situation is different and should be treated on its own merits, but shying away from each way betting could be costing you regular profits.

Share this page: